Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Hughes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1920No. Docket No. 50Published

Error to Bay; Houghton (Samuel G.), J. Proceedings by Frank J. Hughes under the log-lien law against John A. Hughes and the W. C. Sterling & Son Company for work and labor. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant company brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

This action is brought by plaintiff, a brother of defendant Hughes, for whom he was foreman, under the log-lien law (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 14843 et seq.), to enforce a lien claimed by plaintiff on certain cedar posts, poles and ties got out by defendant John A. Hughes, in Chippewa county, and sold by him to W. C. Sterling & Son Company under *688a written contract dated February 15, 1915. Upon this trial the plaintiff recovered a judgment against John A. Hughes for $1,012.25 and for a lien of $920 upon the property described in the declaration, not exceeding $1,200. The appellant brings the case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API