Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 23, 1917No. 6188PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Indictment for seduction; from Laurens superior court—Judge Larsen. November 3, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

It is unnecessary to discuss any ground of the motion for a new trial except the particular ground upon which the lower court is reversed; and no extended discussion of that ground is required, in view of the ruling made by the Supreme Court upon the abstract question decided by that court in this case, and left for application by the Court of Appeals.

The precise question submitted to the Supreme Court, with the answer made thereto by a majority of that court, was as follows: "In the trial of a case of seduction, was the following charge to the jury error because it tended to discredit in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hays v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Bank of Powder SpringsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Conley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  3. Kiser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Bivins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. Ledford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API