Kiser v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
Howard Kiser was convicted of seduction, and he excepts to the overruling of his motion for a new trial.
The 1st special ground of the motion for a new trial alleges that the court erred in failing to charge the law relative to fornication. There was no request for such a charge; the State made out a case of seduction; and the defense of the accused was that h'e never had any sexual intercourse with the girl. “The law of fornication is not involved and should not be given in charge to *569the jury on a trial for seduction where the evidence for the State makes a case of seduction and the defense…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kiser v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Webb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Kiser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931