Legal Opinion
Manitowoc Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairch-ild, C. J.
In its findings of fact, the commission found that the appellant here failed in two respects: (1) To comply with Safety Order No. 34 (a) ; (2) to comply with sec. 101.06, Stats, (safe-place statute). The trial court stated in its memorandum decision the following:
“At the trial and in its trial brief plaintiff challenged the validity of Safety Order No. 34 (a). Most of the evidence produced at the hearing and in the record centers around the violation of this order. The attorney general, who represented the commission at this trial, laid little stress on that issue. He claimed that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hipke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Bentley Bros. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Wenzel & Henoch Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Robert A. Johnston Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Harnischfeger Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manitowoc Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Threshermens Mutual Insurance v. PageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Threshermens Mutual Insurance v. PageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Zernia v. Capitol Court Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Zernia v. Capitol Court Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963