Legal Opinion

Harnischfeger Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

There is no dispute about the injury sustained by Axel Anderson. Pie was setting sheave plates in an open-frame hammer which was being operated by an assistant. Anderson was in charge and he would signal to the operator, or assistant, when the operator was to operate the mechanism for the descent of the hammer. At the time of the accident the operator released the hammer without any signal from Anderson, and as a result Anderson was injured while he had his hands between the dies. The primary compensation of an award of the commission is not questioned. Only the 15 per cent penalty awarded is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wenzel & Henoch Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Poly-America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  2. Manitowoc Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Opinion No. Oag 17-78, (1978), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1978
  4. Mahnke v. AhlesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Manitowoc Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API