Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

California Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2016No. S223129PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CUÉLLAR, J.

Criminal defendants routinely file motions at the outset of their cases to suppress the evidence against them. When a judge grants such a motion, the prosecution may decide to dismiss the case and refile charges. But if the prosecution does refile such charges, Penal Code section 1538.5, subdivision (p)1 provides that any suppression motion the defendant subsequently files must be heard by the “same judge” who granted the prior motion so long as that judge is “available.” The question before us is whether trial courts are vested with discretion to decide whether a judge is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. NievesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  2. People v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. K.R. v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Shorts v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Lugo v. Corona, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API