Legal Opinion
Gilbert v. Burnstine
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 11, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The complaint, in an action to enforce a judgment obtained in Great Britain and founded on an arbitration award, *171was dismissed at Special Term. The plaintiff by this appeal seeks to review that decision.
In June, 1925, the parties to this action entered into an agreement for the sale and delivery by the defendants to the plaintiff of a quantity of zinc concentrates. Embodied in the agreement was an arbitration clause providing that all differences arising between the plaintiff and the defendants under said agreement should be arbitrated in London, England, pursuant to the provisions of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Aktiebolaget v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re Inter-Ocean Food Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Kerr v. TagliaviaNew York Supreme Court · 1917
- Kerr v. . TagliaviaNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Emerson Radio & Phonograph Corp. v. EskindNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Purdy v. McGarityNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Windsor Coin Op, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1972
- Baio v. ManganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Windsor Coin Op, Inc.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1972