Legal Opinion

Purdy v. McGarity

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeyo, J.

This is a negligence action brought by the plaintiff to recover damages to his automobile. The defendant has interposed as a separate defense the following:

“ Second. That prior to the commencement of this action plaintiff Rolland M. Purdy, duly assigned and transferred the alleged cause of action set forth in the complaint herein, and all his right, title and interest therein to an Insurance Corporation, whose name is unknown to the defendant, and that the Insurance Corpora*83tion, at the time of the commencement of the action was, and still is, the sole owner and holder of the cause of action,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Fleischer v. TerkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Adler v. Bush Terminal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Kalle & Co. v. MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Puccio v. CarrNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Barrett v. MatsonNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Woodard v. MarxNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Kooser v. West Penn Railways Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API