Vekamaf Holland B.V. v. Pipe Benders, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a lengthy and involved action for breach of a written secrecy agreement, patent infringement, and misappropriation of trade secrets. The underlying dispute involves machines utilizing a continuous inductive heating method of bending large diameter metal pipes.1
Plaintiffs (hereinafter sometimes referred to collectively as “Vekamaf”) are three Dutch companies engaged in the design, production, and sale of technical and engineering equipment. Vekamaf, the parent company, handles all international sales except those in the United States, which are handled…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- E. W. Bliss Company v. Struthers-Dunn, Inc., P. G. Bartlett, L. K. Clark, D. E. Henry and J. A. DingesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Sam GoldmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Venn v. GoedertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Felipe LothridgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Wyeth v. Natural Biologics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Blizzard v. QuillenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Vekamaf Holland B.V. v. Pipe Benders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.