United States v. Felipe Lothridge
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Felipe Lothridge was convicted of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000). On appeal, he raises three issues, urging that the District Court erred when it denied his motion to suppress, when it admitted evidence of his prior bad acts, and when it admitted the drugs into evidence despite Lothridge’s proffered evidence of tampering. We have no occasion to reach the merits of Lothridge’s claims because the District Court erred when it failed to conduct a de novo review of the magistrate judge’s proposed findings regarding…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cook v. NiedertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- John Hudson v. Tony GammonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- United States v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Gonzalo Uscanga-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Felipe LothridgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2012
- Gordon v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2011
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.