Legal Opinion

Jerrold-Stephens Co. v. Gustaveson, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 15, 1956No. 10025PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITTAKER, District Judge.

This matter is now before me upon the several motions of defendants for a summary judgment, asserting that the pleadings and admissions on file show, as a matter of law, both, that plaintiff has no right to maintain this suit and that it has no cause of action against the defendants or any of them.

This is an action in equity, claiming that plaintiff, a Minnesota corporation, while carrying on a metal furniture manufacturing business in Missouri, there employed, on January 19, 1955 (the date it was incorporated in Minnesota), the defendant, Walters, to set up its…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. Tri-State Amusement Co. v. Forest Park Highlands Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Sandlin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morrow v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
  3. A.B. Chance Co. v. SchmidtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. National Merchandising Corporation v. McAlpinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Salitan v. Carter, Ealey and DinwiddieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API