Legal Opinion
Stenehjem v. Sette
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1976No. Civ. 9136PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VOGEL, Justice.
This appeal arises from a dispute as to whether Lee M. and Judith Stenehjem waived their right under a 1961 agreement with T. W. and Marie Sette to require the Settes to offer stock in the State Bank of Burleigh County to the Stenehjems before selling it to an outsider. The trial court held that the provisions of the agreement had been waived. We affirm.
FACTS
The State Bank of Burleigh County was formerly located in the small town of Sterling, North Dakota, about 24 miles from Bismarck. It was owned by the Wildfang family. During 1960, Lee M. Stenehjem and T. W. Sette, both of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Farmers Cooperative Ass'n of Churchs Ferry v. ColeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Cranston v. WintersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Pollock v. McKenzie County Public School District 1North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. AshkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bankers & Shippers Insurance v. Electro Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Sorlie v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Brunsoman v. ScarlettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Peterson v. Front Page, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.