Cranston v. Winters
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOGEL, Justice.
This case involves competing claims of title to real estate in the city of Minot. It is alleged by the appellants, the residuary legatees and devisees of Syvilla Ballantyne, hereinafter described as Syvilla’s sisters, that they are the owners of the property. They claim their title arises because Syvilla, as the surviving joint tenant of the property, acquired the interest of the other joint tenant, her husband, upon his death, and she still held the fee title at her death, at which time it passed to them under the residuary clause of her will.
The appellees are the eight…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Woodland v. WoodlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- In Re Kaspari's EstateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Schlichenmayer v. LuithleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Gjerstadengen v. HartzellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Farmers Cooperative Ass'n of Churchs Ferry v. ColeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Burlington Northern, Inc. v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Powell v. American Charter Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Gilbertson v. CharlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Johnson v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.