Legal Opinion
Hupp v. Switzerland of Ohio Local School District
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 11, 2012No. Case No. C2-07-628PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff, Timothy Hupp (“Timothy”), was born on June 10, 1997. He resides with his parents, Plaintiffs Jacqueline and Timothy Hupp, in Woodsfield, Ohio. Timothy has been diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”) and Asperger’s Syndrome, a developmental disorder that manifests traits- similar to autism. Children with Asperger’s Syndrome have difficulties with social interaction, and have restrictive and fixative patterns of interest ,in particular topics or behaviors.1
This matter began when Plaintiffs filed a due…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- A.W. v. Tennessee Department of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Dougall v. Copley-Fairlawn City School District Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- G.C.A. v. Williamson County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
- G.E. v. Williamson County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- G.S. v. Clarksville Montgomery County School SystemDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.