Fountain v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
Appellant has filed a pro se motion to complete the record. The State has not objected to his motion. He alleges that discussions between the trial court, counsel and himself on several enumerated occasions, which were overruled, were not recorded and, thus only appear in the transcript as “off the record” notations. He also contends that “in chambers” conferences between the court and counsel were only noted as being “off the record.”
After reviewing appellant’s allegations, we conclude that a few of the conferences held at the bench and in chambers were not recorded and are only noted as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SwensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- State v. BollingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. GreenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- State v. BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. GuffeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Dumond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Travis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.