Legal Opinion
County of Amador v. City of Plymouth
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 2007No. C050066PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate invalidating a municipal services agreement (MSA) between the lone Band of Miwok Indians (the Tribe) and the City of Plymouth (the City) on the ground the City entered the agreement without complying with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.)
The City is a small town located in the County of Amador (the county). The Tribe states it is a federally recognized Indian tribe. It has options to purchase 228 acres of land located in or adjacent to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Keene v. HarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Golden Gate Land Holdings LLC v. East Bay Regional Park DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Parchester Village Neighborhood Council v. City of RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- City of Long Beach v. City of LACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Com. for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara Cty. Bd. of Sup'rsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008