Legal Opinion

Golden Gate Land Holdings LLC v. East Bay Regional Park District

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 2013No. A135593PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRUINIERS, J.

Appellant Golden Gate Land Holdings LLC (Golden Gate) owns 140 acres of land straddling the border of Albany and Berkeley, on the east shore of San Francisco Bay. The site includes the Golden Gate Fields racetrack. The East Bay Regional Park District (the District) approved a resolution of necessity to condemn eight shoreline acres of Golden Gate’s property to help complete the Eastshore State Park (Eastshore Park), and to construct a segment of the San Francisco Bay Trail (the Bay Trail). The District concluded that the project was exempt from the California Environmental…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. State Lands CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Citizens for Restoration of L Street v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Defend Our Waterfront v. State Lands CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Saltonstall v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Cal. Dep't of Fish & Wildlife, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API