Legal Opinion

Parchester Village Neighborhood Council v. City of Richmond

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 2010No. A123859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DONDERO, J.

Defendants the City of Richmond and the City Council of the City of Richmond (City) appeal the judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate invalidating a municipal services agreement (MSA) entered into by the City and the Scotts Valley Band of Porno Indians of California (Tribe). The trial court concluded the City violated the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) (CEQA) when it approved the MSA. We reverse.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Tribe is a federally recognized Indian tribe whose status was terminated in 1965 and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sierra Club v. State Board of ForestryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Save Tara v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fair v. City of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Delaware Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API