Legal Opinion

Camden Fire Ins. v. Penick

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 20, 1924No. 4241PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit for the proportion of the value of potton covered by the defendant company’s fire insurance policy. Plaintiff’s warehouse and the cotton stored therein were destroyed by fire. The insurance policy contains the provisions that the insured within 60 days 'after the fire shall render to the insurer a sworn statement of the amount of loss and that the policy shall be void in case of fraud or false swearing by the insured touching any matter relating to the subject of the insurance. The defense was that the plaintiff iti. his sworn proof of loss included bales…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Insurance Companies v. WeidesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atlas Assur. Co. of London v. HurstCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. Palace Cafe v. Hartford Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  3. Brooks Fiveash v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. WithamDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015
  5. Great American Ins. Co. of New York v. Roney & Berger Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API