Legal Opinion
Management Recruiters of Portland, Inc. v. Harold Moore & Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 17, 1993No. 9102-00830; CA A71223PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
Plaintiff brought this action for breach of contract. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. ORCP 21A(2). We affirm.
Plaintiff bears the burden of alleging and proving facts sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. Showalter v. Edwards and Associates, Inc., 112 Or App 472, 476, 831 P2d 58, rev den 314 Or 391 (1992). Despite plaintiffs assertions to the contrary, in determining whether defendant is subject to the jurisdiction of an Oregon court, the trial court looks to the pleadings and the affidavits of both parties. ORCP 21A provides,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Neptune Microfloc, Inc. v. First Florida Utilities, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Showalter v. Edwards and Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Smith v. O'BYRNECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sutherland v. BrennanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Nike USA, Inc. v. Pro Sports Wear, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Wallace v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Dreher v. SmithsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Biggs v. Robert Thomas, O.D., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.