Nike USA, Inc. v. Pro Sports Wear, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Plaintiff, an Oregon corporation, appeals a judgment dismissing this action to collect a commercial debt from defendants, an Ohio corporation and its individual guarantor, an Ohio resident, after the trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the action for lack of personal jurisdiction. ORCP 21 A(2). The trial court dismissed the action on the grounds that plaintiff had not established either that defendants consented to jurisdiction in Oregon, ORCP 4 A(5), or that an exercise of long-arm jurisdiction was constitutionally permissible under ORCP 4 L. Because we conclude that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Reeves v. Chem Industrial CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Circus Circus Reno, Inc. v. PopeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- O'Neil v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Swank v. Terex Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- PNC Multifamily Capital Institutional Fund XXXIV Ltd. Partnership v. AOH-Regent Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- M. C. v. Quest Global, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.