Legal Opinion
L-O-G
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1996No. ID 3281PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3281 Interim Decision #3281 In re L-O-G-, Respondent File A28 862 064 et al.- Miami Decided June 14, 1996 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Reopening may be had where the new facts alleged, together with the facts already of record, indicate a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits, so as to make it worthwhile to develop the issues at a hearing. Where ruling on a motion requires the exercise of judg- ment regarding eligibility for the relief sought, the Board does not require a conclusive showing that,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha WangSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Rios-PinedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- VELARDEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- J-JBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
- S-VBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2000
- Shardar v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- G-DBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.