Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Hartwig

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

No bill of exceptions was settled and the appeal from the judgment is before us on the pleadings, charge to the jury, verdict, and judgment. The pleadings frame the issue which the court sent to the jury and which the jury answered. The judgment is in accord with the verdict. For lack of a bill of exceptions, this court cannot go further into plaintiff’s claims of error. Davis v. Davis (1951), 259 Wis. 1, 2, 47 N. W. (2d) 338, and authorities there cited. Berkemeyer v. Milwaukee Automobile Ins. Co. (1950), 256 Wis. 386, 387, 41 N. W. (2d) 303. The charge to the jury is correct as abstract…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Berkemeyer v. Milwaukee Automobile Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rodenbeck v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Ramminger v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API