Pippenger v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHRUM, Judge.
Movant 1 pled guilty to a charge of failure to appear. He received a 5-year sentence to run concurrently to a 20-year sentence on a conviction for rape. 2 Movant now appeals from an order denying post-conviction relief under former Rule 27.26 3 on his failure to appear conviction.
Movant’s motion was originally filed pro se December 28, 1984. His initial grounds for seeking relief were that: (a) the guilty plea was involuntary because it was an “equivocal plea”; (b) movant was misad-vised and misled concerning service of the additional consecutive sentence; and (c) a conviction…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mallett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Lingar v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Boggs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Trehan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Ennis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Pelton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mosby v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Trehan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.