Legal Opinion

Lingar v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 14, 1989No. 70932PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Chief Justice.

Appellant Stanley Lingar filed a post-conviction motion under Rule 27.26 seeking relief from a sentence and judgment of death for first degree murder which were affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Lingar, 726 S.W.2d 728 (Mo.banc 1987). An evidentiary hearing was conducted on appellant’s multiple grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. The court made and entered written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and entered judgment denying appellant’s motion. Affirmed.

In O'Neal v. State, 766 S.W.2d 91 (Mo. banc 1989) (1989), the Court reviewed the rules applicable in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. State v. LingarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  4. Futrell v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. FeltropSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Sloan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API