Legal Opinion

Campton v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1944No. 6675PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONOUGH, Justice.

Review of an order of the Industrial Commission denying plaintiff’s application for an award as dependents of Charles N. Campton, deceased. Campton was killed by accident while in the course of his employment on April 17, 1943. The decision of the Commission was predicated on its determination that the applicants, plaintiffs here, were not dependents of deceased within the meaning of 42-1-67, U. C. A. 1943.

Plaintiff, designated as Mary Campton, but whose legal name was Mary Vaughn, was some time prior to 1936 married to one Edward C. Vaughn. They lived at Durango, Colorado.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schurler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Sanders v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Utah Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Utah Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pathfinder Coach Division of Superior Coach Corp. v. CottrellMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Tatum v. TatumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Earley v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Rocky Mountain Helicopter, Inc. v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Atkins v. Employers Mutual Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API