Legal Opinion

Rocky Mountain Helicopter, Inc. v. Carter

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1982No. 17659PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

This appeal is from an order of the Industrial Commission which found that the defendants are entitled to benefits under Utah’s Workmen’s Compensation Law. The plaintiffs, the employer of the defendants’ deceased father and the employer’s insurer, allege error in the Commission’s construction of § 35-1-71, U.C.A., 1953.

The parties are agreed as to the essential facts. Thomas and Jan Carter were divorced in September, 1972. There were two children of the marriage, Shannon and Brian, the defendants. The Decree of Divorce provided that Jan Carter have custody of the children and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Campton v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Earley v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zezas Ranch, Inc. v. Board of ControlWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Crenshaw v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. MacDonald v. MacDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Tuom v. Duane Hall TruckingUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wengert v. Double OO Hot ShotUtah Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API