Legal Opinion

Felt v. Mitchell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1909No. 6,761PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Hancock Circuit Court; Robert L. Mason, Judge. Action by Edward W. Pelt and another against John P. Mitchell. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

Appellants, as copartners in the practice of the law, sued appellee for attorneys’ fees alleged to be due to them for professional services rendered to him in certain cases in which he was the defendant.

Issues were formed by defendant’s answer in two paragraphs: (1) General denial; (2) setting up the six-year statute of limitations, to which plaintiffs replied by denial.

There was evidence tending to show the employment, services rendered by virtue thereof, and the value of the services. At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence the court directed the jury to return a verdict for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bathgate v. . HaskinNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Bartlett v. Odd FelLows' Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Mygatt v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Langdon v. Town of CastletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  5. Little v. CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cazares v. SaenzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Frates v. NicholsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Platt v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. In re: Cytophil, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
  5. Rothrock v. HamlinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API