Legal Opinion

Blount County Bank v. Robinett McCay

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1929No. 6 Div. 357PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The plaintiff introduced in evidence the note sued on. The defendants pleaded the general issue in short by consent and a failure of consideration, and offered evidence tending to prove that J. A. Head was a cotton buyer buying cotton at Oneonta; that the defendants were warehousemen storing cotton, upon which they issued standard warehouse receipts ; that Head bought cotton from farmers, and in paying for same he gave check for the purchase price on the bank, attached the warehouse receipt, and, when so attached, the bank paid the cheek, retaining the receipts as security for the money…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Parker v. BondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Jefferson County Savings Bank v. ComptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Tuskaloosa Cotton-Seed Oil Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Patrick v. PettySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. Drake v. Elewellen & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1858

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gorman-Gammill Seed & Dairy Supply Co. v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Redmond v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Utley v. StevensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. James v. CortrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Kilgore v. ArantAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API