Legal Opinion

Miller Bros. v. Direct Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1922No. 6 Div. 628PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The action of the court in overruling the defendants’ motion for a new trial, is the only question here presented for consideration. The grounds of the motion ■were stated in very general language, and it may he seriously questioned that the court is required to further inspect the record for the ascertainment of the particular rulings on evidence, of which complaint is made. Moneagle v. Livingston, 150 Ala. 562, 43 South. 843. We pass this question, however, without decision, and rest our conclusion upon the matters of merit involved'in the appeal.

This litigation arises out of a contract in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Long v. AddixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Rainey v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Moneagle & Co. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Brady v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Robbins v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Alabama Trunk & Luggage Co. v. HauerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Moore v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Stephenson Brick Co. v. Bessemer Engineering Const.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Grissom v. J. B. Colt & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API