Legal Opinion
Lucky-Goldstar Int'l (America), Inc. v. S.S. California Mercury
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 7, 1990No. 89 Civ. 8591 (PKL)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & OPINION
LEISURE, District Judge:
Plaintiff seeks $62,500 for damage to a machine that allegedly occurred while the machine was in transit between Busan, Korea, and South Kearny, New Jersey. Defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”), has moved for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, seeking to limit its potential liability to $500 under 46 U.S.C.App. §§ 1300-1315, the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (“COGSA”).
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Lucky-Goldstar Int’l (America), Inc., (“Lucky”), seeks recovery of $62,500 from the above-named defendants for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. M/v Peisander, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- The Monrosa v. Carbon Black Export, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Boston Metals Co. v. the Winding GulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Koal Industries Corp. v. Asland, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Delphi-Delco Electronics Systems v. M/V NEDLLOYD EUROPADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- American Dredging Co. v. Plaza Petroleum Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Hapag Lloyd Container Linie, GmbHCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Taisho Marine & Fire Insurance v. Maersk Line, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.