Legal Opinion

Taisho Marine & Fire Insurance v. Maersk Line, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 8, 1992No. 91 C 4375PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Taisho Marine and Fire Insurance Company, Limited (“Taisho”) as subrogee of Hamai Machine Tools of America, Inc. (“Hamai”) sues Maersk Line, Inc. (“Maersk Line”), Bridge Terminal Transport, Inc. (“Bridge Terminal”) and the vessel M/V Arnold Maersk (the “Vessel”) (defendants will be collectively referred to as “Maersk,” treated for convenience as a singular noun), charging damage to some Hamai-manufactured machinery while it was being shipped from Tokyo, Japan to Chicago, Illinois. Taisho sues under the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (“COGSA,”…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Capitol Converting Equipment, Incorporated v. Lep Transport, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Boston Metals Co. v. the Winding GulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tokio Marine & Fire Ins. Co., Ltd. v. KaishaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997
  2. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Toshiba International Corp. v. M/V "Sea-Land Express,"District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  4. Canon USA, Inc. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
  5. General Electric Co. v. Inter-Ocean ShippingDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API