Legal Opinion

Raventas v. Green

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 6,834PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, and an order denying a new trial, in the Twelfth District Court, County of San Mateo. Daingerfield, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ross, J.:

One McClellan had leased a tract of land, on which he had growing a crop of unripe grain. An action was commenced against him for the recovery of a money demand, in which action a writ of attachment was issued and levied by the sheriff on the growing crop. Afterwards McClellan executed to the assignor of the plaintiffs, who had a notice of the attachment, a chattel mortgage on the crop. When the crop matured, the sheriff, holding the writ, reaped it, and subsequently, under an execution issued in the action against McClellan, sold it. The j/resent action is brought by the holders of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. McFarlaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Power Mercantile Co. v. Moore Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Rudolph v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Keith v. RamageMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Huston v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API