Brown v. Harris
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Erazer, J. Assumpsit by Louis Brown against Saul Harris, Benjamin Harris, Joseph A. Zechman, and George D. Clark, copartners as Harris Bros. & Co., for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff, ahd defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
Plaintiff brought this suit in assumpisit to recover the contract price of certain cotton worsteds .alleged to have been sold to defendants. These worsteds were delivered in pursuance of an executory contract. It was contended by the plaintiff that they did in fact conform to the description in the contract; that defendants received them, and never notified plaintiff of any claim that they did not conform to the contract. On the other hand, defendants insist that the goods did not conform to the contract description; that they refused to accept them, and promptly notified plaintiff of this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sterling v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Williams v. RobbMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Talbot Paving Co. v. GormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Scheel v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Wolverton v. McCabeMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by10 opinions
- Solomon v. WeinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Hoekzema v. Van HaftenMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Holbrook v. BlickMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Hammond v. PorterMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Huot v. Reeder Bros. Shoe Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.