Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. Blick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1932No. Docket No. 224, Calendar No. 36,132PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Frank Holbrook conducted a nursery from the yard and garage in the rear of his home, .and also did some landscape gardening. He had previously worked in an automobile factory and had but little experience in financial and real estate transactions. He and his "wife are plaintiffs herein. They had come to rely wholly on the business advice of one Edward S. Blick, defendant herein, and believed him to be honest and able, and one of their very best friends. Blick was the branch manager of a large bank in Detroit, and represented to plaintiffs that the president of the bank was a close friend of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beecher v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Stoney Creek Woolen Co. v. SmalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Pratt v. Allegan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Merlau v. Kalamazoo Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. German Bundesheim Society v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sweet v. ShreveMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Hubert v. JoslinMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Ramos v. HolmbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Ramos v. HolmbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Rossman v. MarshMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API