Huot v. Reeder Bros. Shoe Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Alpena; Emerick, J. Bill by Joseph Huot and Mel vina Huot against the Reeder Brothers Shoe Company, Ferdinand Huot, and John Willis to set aside an execution levy and to reform a deed. From a decree for complainants, defendant shoe company appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
Complainants, as grantees of Delphine Huot, claim to be the equitable owners of lot No. 5, block 2, of Carter’s Addition to the city of Alpena. The legal title to this lot stands in the name of defendant Ferdinand Huot, the husband of Delphine and the father of complainant Joseph. Appellant claims a lien on said lot as an execution creditor of said defendant Ferdinand. Com*163plainants brought this suit to clear up the title to said lot, and to procure a conveyance from said Ferdinand. They obtained a decree in the court below. Defendant appellant, the Reeder Bros. Shoe Company, appeals to this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brown v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Michigan Trust Co. v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by3 opinions
- Feltham v. BlunckIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- H. C. & W. B. Reynolds Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Ashley v. MitchellSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 1932