Legal Opinion
Callahan v. Fluhr
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided March 9, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Creal, Commissioner — ■
Affirming.
Charles Callahan instituted this action in the Jefferson circuit court against Harvey Fluhr and H. J. Steilberg and Arthur M. Steilberg, trading and doing, business as H. J. Steilberg & Son, or Steilberg Construction Company, seeking to recover damages in the sum of $53,500 for personal injuries sustained when he was struck by an automobile of H. J. Steilberg & Son which he alleges resulted from the negligent operation of the automobile by Harvey Fluhr who was at the time the agent and servant of his codefendants and acting in the course…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fox v. Hudson's Extx.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. McElroyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Western & Southern Life Ins. v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Kentucky Central Life & Accident Insurance v. BurrsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
3Cited by5 opinions
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Baker's Adm'x v. Louisville N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Poteete v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Smallwood v. Kentucky & West Virginia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Mathis' Adm'r v. West Kentucky Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941