Legal Opinion

C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. v. Rahn

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided February 25, 2000No. CIV. 97-896 JP/JHGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PARKER, District Judge.

The parties have submitted this case for decision without trial on the stipulated record. Having carefully considered the stipulated record in light of-the parties’ arguments, written and oral, I find for the Defendants with respect to the Equal Protection Clause claim and for Plaintiff Charles S. McCrossan with respect to the Privileges and Immunities Clause claim.

I. Background

Plaintiff Charles S. McCrossan, a Minnesota resident, owns a majority of the stock of Plaintiff McCrossan Construction, a Minnesota corporation. Plaintiffs are engaged…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API