Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rodriquez

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1989No. 2661PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

This is a timely appeal by the Commonwealth of a trial court Order granting appellee’s motion to suppress physical evidence recovered during a warrantless search. The Commonwealth has properly certified the pre-trial suppression Order substantially handicaps the prosecution of this case, making this appeal a proper appeal from a final Order of court. Commonwealth v. Dugger, 506 Pa. 537, 486 A.2d 382 (1985).

On January 28, 1988 at 1:00 p.m. two Philadelphia police officers were conducting an undercover narcotics investigation. While driving down the street the officers observed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarconiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. MickensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. BlackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. In the Interest of J.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API