Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 14, 2003No. SC 84523PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

The Director of Revenue (Director) seeks review of the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission (Commission) that Ford Motor Company (Ford) is entitled to a refund of use taxes.

This Court has jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. V, section 3. Ford’s claim for a refund was not filed within the three-year limitations period of section 144.190.2. 1 The three-year limitations period of section 144.190.2 (as to erroneously or illegally collected or computed tax) is started when the taxpayer remits payment of tax on the transactions that generate the issue of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis Country Club v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Sprint Communications Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. P.L.S. ex rel. Shelton v. KosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Insurance Co. of PA v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  3. Cromeans v. Morgan Keegan & Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2014
  4. Stigger v. MannMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Kirkwood Glass Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API