Legal Opinion
Cromeans v. Morgan Keegan & Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided February 24, 2014No. 2:12-CV-04269-NKLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, District Judge.
Third-Party Defendants the City of Moberly, Missouri and the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Moberly move to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint of Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc. for failure to state a claim. [Doc. # 197], For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED.
I. Background
On July 15, 2010, the City of Moberly, Missouri (“the City”) approved issuance of $39 million in municipal bonds by the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Moberly (“the IDA”). The bonds were issued by the IDA to finance a project that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Southers v. City of FarmingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund v. City of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Susla v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Bachtel v. Miller County Nursing Home DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Woods v. Homes & Structures of Pittsburg, Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jayhawk Racing Props., LLC v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
- Jose Urena v. Central California Almond Growers Assn.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Krupka v. Stifel Nicolaus & Company IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
- Pearson v. Pleasant Hill, Missouri, City ofDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022