Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge.
“This is another case requiring the application of a statutory framework that first took shape in the thirties and forties to the technology of the eighties and nineties.” Bridge Data Co. v. Director of Revenue, 794 S.W.2d 204, 205 (Mo. banc 1990).
I
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (“Bell”) appeals a decision by the Administrative Hearing Commission (“AHC”), denying Bell a refund of use tax paid on machinery used to provide basic and vertical telephone services. GTE Automatic Elec. v. Director of Revenue held in 1989 that telephone services were not products…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Concord Publishing House, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- West Lake Quarry & Material Co. v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Heidelberg Central, Inc. v. Director of Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- International Business MacHetes Corp. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Bridge Data Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Yellow Pages, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Six Flags Theme Parks, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Branson Properties USA, L.P. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- In Re the Appeal of Sprint Communications Co., L.P.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.