Williams v. State, Department of Revenue
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Mary Ann Williams sought workers’ compensation benefits for physical and mental injuries she claimed she sustained as a result of her employment with the State Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED). The Board denied both claims, and the superior court affirmed. We affirm the denial of Williams’s mental injury claim, because we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that she did not suffer an “injury” as that term is restrictively defined by AS 23.30.395(17). 1 We reverse the denial of Williams’s physical injury claim and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
- Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- DeYonge v. Nana/MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Tolbert v. Alascom, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Hodges v. Alaska Constructors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Robertson v. American Mechanical, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.