Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Mooney

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1937No. Crim. 3898Published

1Opinion of the Court

10 Cal.2d 1 (1937)

In the Matter of the Application of THOMAS J. MOONEY for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Crim. No. 3898.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

October 29, 1937.

Frank P. Walsh, John F. Finerty and George T. Davis for Petitioner.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, William F. Cleary and Emery F. Mitchell, Deputies Attorney-General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

By this proceeding in habeas corpus, the petitioner, Thomas J. Mooney, seeks his release from the custody of the warden of the state prison at San Quentin, where he is confined pursuant to a judgment on a verdict finding him guilty of murder…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. In Re MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Skipper v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. People v. BillingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API