Pacific Business Connections, Inc. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHMANN-GERST, J.
Following the denial of its insurance claim, appellant Pacific Business Connections, Inc. (PBC), brought this action against its insurer, respondent St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company (St. Paul). St. Paul asserted that it was required to cancel the insurance policy pursuant to Insurance Code section 673 (section 673) once it received notice from Premium Financing Specialists of California, Inc. (Premium), the company that financed the insurance premiums, that PBC had defaulted on its loan obligation. The trial court agreed, and granted St. Paul summary judgment.
PB…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Kotlar v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Gorham Co. v. First Financial InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Hoffman v. Citadel General Assurance, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Klotz v. Old Line Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DuBeck v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Northfield Insurance Company v. Tilted Turtle Entertainment LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021