Legal Opinion
Stull v. Sparrow
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 3, 2001No. E028669PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAMIREZ, P. J.
Plaintiff Rachelle Stull (Stull) appeals from a postjudgment order denying her motion for costs and fees under Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 2033, subdivision (o). 2 She claims that the trial court erred in determining that the defendants’ admission of liability on the eve of trial precluded the order she sought. We disagree and affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
According to Stull’s complaint, this action arose on August 30, 1995, when defendant Chad Allan Sparrow (Sparrow) negligently operated a motor vehicle, thereby causing her injury. Defendants Gregory Chapin…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Wimberly v. Derby Cycle Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- AVANT! CORP. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Garcia v. Hyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- St. Mary v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Bloxham v. SaldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Metropolitan Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Hewitt v. FeldermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.