Legal Opinion

Hunt v. S Y Cattle Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1926No. 5,852PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Staek

The plaintiffs, copartners under the name of Hunt & White, brought this action against the defendant, a corporation, to recover the sum of $5,346.15, alleged to be due them for running, pasturing and grazing certain cattle for the defendant on their range in Custer county.

The complaint alleges that between April 1, 1923, and June 15, 1923, the defendant turned over to plaintiffs 2,300 head of cattle, under an agreement that they were to be grazed and cared for by them until the fifteenth day of October, 1923. Before the cattle were turned over to the plaintiffs, the parties had a verbal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
  2. Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Green v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Ambler v. WhippleSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Loewi v. LongWashington Supreme Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gravelin v. PorierMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Hetherington v. Ford Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. A. T. Klemens & Son v. Reber Plumbing & Heating Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Carlson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1999
  5. Hughes v. MelbyMontana Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API