Legal Opinion
Schiffner v. Pappas
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 1963No. Civ. 10670PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
Appellants (whom we shall refer to collectively as “Pappas”) filed a notice of appeal from adverse judgments in superior court actions No. 13028 and No. 13046. These actions had been consolidated for trial. Pappas’ brief on appeal attacks only the judgment in No. 13046. We regard the appeal from the judgment in No. 13028 as having been abandoned, and the appeal in that action is dismissed.
Pappas entered into a contract with respondents (referred to herein as “the Schiffners”) to purchase a sawmill on deferred installment payments; to buy timber rights and to engage the Schiffners to log the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Nesbit v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Flynn v. California Casket Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Powell v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
3Cited by5 opinions
- Still v. Plaza Marina Commercial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Riverside Fence Co. v. NovakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Armstrong v. PicquelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Layton v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Estreito v. Citirealty Corp. (In Re Estreito)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990