Legal Opinion

People v. Lueth

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 2012No. E053476PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

A 911 caller reported seeing defendant Eric Preston Lueth using a tire iron to hit a woman and to damage a vehicle. When the police arrived, defendant’s girlfriend had a rapidly swelling bump on her forehead, and her Jeep was damaged. Defendant was bleeding from a cut on his head. The girlfriend refused to tell the police what had happened. At trial, however, she testified that defendant did hit her, but indoors, with his fist; she did not remember being hit outdoors, with a tire iron.

A jury found defendant guilty of aggravated assault (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. RussoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. CanizalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. CissnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. Kozee-Stoltz CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. Lobo CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. People v. Mejia CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. Pearsall CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. Vermillion CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API