Legal Opinion
State v. Tate
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 5, 2004No. AC 22801PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The defendant, Jefferey Tate, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of two counts of sale of narcotics by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b) and two counts of sale of narcotics within 1500 feet of apublic school and apublic housing project in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) improper comments made by the prosecutor during closing argument deprived the defendant of a fair trial and (2) the court improperly admitted evidence of uncharged…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. MillanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. SargentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. MuleroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. FauciConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.